Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Fx vs Dx Comparisons
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marcel" data-source="post: 52688" data-attributes="member: 3903"><p>OK guys, time for truth.</p><p></p><p>In both cases, shot ONE is….(drum roll) FX</p><p></p><p>Where it gets interesting is that for the DX shots, the table was with the D90 and the 35-70 2.8, and for the second one it was the D7000 with the 17-55 2.8. So, since the baker shot was reduced in size, you can see the baker is a tad larger than the FX shot made with the D700.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for your interest with this "non scientific" experience.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marcel, post: 52688, member: 3903"] OK guys, time for truth. In both cases, shot ONE is….(drum roll) FX Where it gets interesting is that for the DX shots, the table was with the D90 and the 35-70 2.8, and for the second one it was the D7000 with the 17-55 2.8. So, since the baker shot was reduced in size, you can see the baker is a tad larger than the FX shot made with the D700. Thanks for your interest with this "non scientific" experience. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
Fx vs Dx Comparisons
Top
