Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="panthera_nl" data-source="post: 30994" data-attributes="member: 7611">Thank you all for your comments! First I must still figure out how all the aperture, shutter speed and ISO  combinations go into work before I can even think of going to buy a new lens .But that is not keeping me from obtaining some useful info about the eventual successor lens to shoot the subjects im really interested in,which is nature/landscapes and wildlife.Also where I live in Almere, birds are surely the greatest subject ... Meanwhile I heard a lot about the 300mm from people whom are using it,and the disadvantages/disadvantage of the lens, of what ive heard is if you do use this particular lens,that it is a must to do so with a tripod to get the best pictures , this right? (Stabilization ).... I've also heard a lot about Sigma lenses (in particular the 150-500mm)are a good choice and will definitely go surfing on the net and find some more info on their performances, price and the corresponding weight which comes with it :-(... .... Is it possible for these lenses to be combined with a 1.4/1.7TC ? I'll let you know  which lens i've finally chosen when the time comes and also what i thought of the lens,by then i will have learned a lot moreabout not only which lenses and the mm's but also about what you can actually really do with them & the camera to get that picture you want.. Regards, Wanja PS: The reason for the differences in lenses and their prices is just simply that I had looked at Konijenberg.nl ( photography equipment site in Holland)and saw these two lenses and thought find out some information from people who've used them or know about them and the performances of lenses ... But yes now I know that I've got the 18-200mm sorted,its obvious that i will need to upgrade the mm's)</blockquote>

Verification