Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Feedback
From a distance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marcel" data-source="post: 248898" data-attributes="member: 3903"><p>Both, you could go 1/800 and iso 640. It seems you exposed for the average where your main subjects were in the shadow. The fact that the foreground is predominant also reinforces the darkness of your main subjects. If there was more trees and less foreground, the horses would look lighter.</p><p></p><p>Have you tried to recover the shadows in post processing? You could probably recover the shadows, crop a little more to remove the excess foreground and you might have a better balanced picture.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marcel, post: 248898, member: 3903"] Both, you could go 1/800 and iso 640. It seems you exposed for the average where your main subjects were in the shadow. The fact that the foreground is predominant also reinforces the darkness of your main subjects. If there was more trees and less foreground, the horses would look lighter. Have you tried to recover the shadows in post processing? You could probably recover the shadows, crop a little more to remove the excess foreground and you might have a better balanced picture. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photo Evaluation
Photo Feedback
From a distance
Top
