Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Whiskeyman" data-source="post: 559193" data-attributes="member: 13556">I got to handle a Nikon with the roll film back a long time ago, and while I'm sure its heft made an impression, it was how unwieldy the rig was that made the biggest impression.  That rig had its place on a tripod in the portrait studio, for it certainly wasn't a walk around camera!  It likely had either a 105 f 1.8 or a 200 f2 on the front of it, but I'm not sure which.I did not realize the difference in the finders and hadn't thought about it, either.  I'm going to have to look into it more.  I do know that there are a lot of old film cameras that I would have loved to own 35-40 years ago being sold today.  I'd love to get your take on which one(s) to really be interested in.WM</blockquote>