Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 161242" data-attributes="member: 13090">Well if you limit it to &quot;very low light&quot;, &quot;on camera&quot; and saving more than &quot;a few hundred ISO&quot; you're really restricting the use potential. Personally I don't like using flash as the SOLE light source either, but it can work wonders when diffused properly in mixed lighting situations for one thing. My primary use of flash is for outdoor fill. I can do a lot in post, yes, but really? Sit down at my computer, boot up Photoshop, grab the RAW, start playing with levels, and curves and blah, blah, blah... or... Take an extra two seconds to get the shot right, in-camera? Sure, post' has it's place but I like to minimize the time I spend in post, personally, not take shots I know are going to require it just to pass muster. But, then, that's me and my style and my sense of workflow. If you just don't like flash, you're certainly not required to use it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 161242, member: 13090"] Well if you limit it to "very low light", "on camera" and saving more than "a few hundred ISO" you're really restricting the use potential. Personally I don't like using flash as the SOLE light source either, but it can work wonders when diffused properly in mixed lighting situations for one thing. My primary use of flash is for outdoor fill. I can do a lot in post, yes, but really? Sit down at my computer, boot up Photoshop, grab the RAW, start playing with levels, and curves and blah, blah, blah... or... Take an extra two seconds to get the shot right, in-camera? Sure, post' has it's place but I like to [I]minimize[/I] the time I spend in post, personally, not take shots I know are going to require it just to pass muster. But, then, that's me and my style and my sense of workflow. If you just don't like flash, you're certainly not required to use it. [/QUOTE]

Verification