Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Flashes
Flash Sync Speed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 229552" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>I can't answer about the first one not being sharp. I really don't see much difference, but yes, a little. I can't see the full size original of course, that you saw.</p><p></p><p>If it was black without the flash, then it was not camera shake. The speedlight at 1/16 power should have been around 1/11,000 second, which will handle camera shake. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>However, I cannot resolve the conflict (to me) that ISO 400 f/11 could bounce at 1/16 power. Even it was a lower 8 foot ceiling, f/11 ISO 400 would need closer to full power. And full power is not very fast. The manual says 1/900 second, but there is a quirk. That is measured t.5, which is half power points, the time it is above half power. There is a lot of flash left, so it is slower. A t.1 time would measure 90% of it, and is classically assumed 3x longer, which would only be 1/300 second. However, lower power levels are cut off truncated (no trailing tail), so its about the same number either way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 229552, member: 12496"] I can't answer about the first one not being sharp. I really don't see much difference, but yes, a little. I can't see the full size original of course, that you saw. If it was black without the flash, then it was not camera shake. The speedlight at 1/16 power should have been around 1/11,000 second, which will handle camera shake. :) However, I cannot resolve the conflict (to me) that ISO 400 f/11 could bounce at 1/16 power. Even it was a lower 8 foot ceiling, f/11 ISO 400 would need closer to full power. And full power is not very fast. The manual says 1/900 second, but there is a quirk. That is measured t.5, which is half power points, the time it is above half power. There is a lot of flash left, so it is slower. A t.1 time would measure 90% of it, and is classically assumed 3x longer, which would only be 1/300 second. However, lower power levels are cut off truncated (no trailing tail), so its about the same number either way. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Flashes
Flash Sync Speed
Top