Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mediaman09" data-source="post: 402457" data-attributes="member: 9503">Well, I'm sure that's generally true, but apparently it's not that simple, as outlined in Chris's specific experience with this fisheye and the 5100, as noted above. In his detailed assessment, he talks of many out if focus photos. As well there is a known issue with a factory miscalibrated focus ring, which needs to be fixed by either retuning the lens or doing some local surgery. Ref: <a href="https://www.flickr.com/groups/fish-eye/discuss/72157623021064866" target="_blank">https://www.flickr.com/groups/fish-eye/discuss/72157623021064866</a>At almost $400 on the road, I was simply not comfortable with all that drama, for something that, as you say, should mostly not be an issue. </blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mediaman09, post: 402457, member: 9503"] [FONT=UICTFontTextStyleBody]Well, I'm sure that's generally true, but apparently it's not that simple, as outlined in Chris's specific experience with this fisheye and the 5100, as noted above. In[/FONT] his detailed assessment, he talks of many out if focus photos. [FONT=UICTFontTextStyleBody] As well there is a known issue with a factory miscalibrated focus ring, which needs to be fixed by either retuning the lens or doing some local surgery. Ref: [URL]https://www.flickr.com/groups/fish-eye/discuss/72157623021064866[/URL] [/FONT][FONT=UICTFontTextStyleBody] At almost $400 on the road, I was simply not comfortable with all that drama, for something that, as you say, should mostly not be an issue. [/FONT] [/QUOTE]

Verification