Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
First Test Drive of "The Stack": Nikkor 200-500 with a 1.4 TC on the D7100
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="D200freak" data-source="post: 529898" data-attributes="member: 41018"><p><strong>Re: First Test Drive of "The Stack": Nikkor 200-500 with a 1.4 TC on the D7100</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm glad to read this. I have a Tamron 150-600 and I have tried a Nikon 200-500 in the store. Your findings matched my own impressions exactly. </p><p></p><p>For a non-moving subject, the Tamron is just as good plus has a little extra zoom, which I like. </p><p></p><p>But once you're looking at a moving subject, be it birds in flight, planes at an airshow, or cars at a race course, the Nikon is the better lens and it's only a few hundred dollars more. </p><p></p><p>I'm now setting aside some money for the Nikon lens. When I have set aside enough, I will probably list my Tamron on ebay (I got it so cheaply I can probably make a profit on it anyway) and then use the proceeds to buy the Nikon at that time. </p><p></p><p>What makes this choice for me is the fact that I enjoy taking action shots more than photographing non-moving subjects. Faster focus action, better VR, and a better chance of AF NOT getting lost with a large change in subject range all point me toward the Nikon. </p><p></p><p>For non-moving or slow moving subjects, I'd keep the Tamron and never worry about it again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="D200freak, post: 529898, member: 41018"] [b]Re: First Test Drive of "The Stack": Nikkor 200-500 with a 1.4 TC on the D7100[/b] I'm glad to read this. I have a Tamron 150-600 and I have tried a Nikon 200-500 in the store. Your findings matched my own impressions exactly. For a non-moving subject, the Tamron is just as good plus has a little extra zoom, which I like. But once you're looking at a moving subject, be it birds in flight, planes at an airshow, or cars at a race course, the Nikon is the better lens and it's only a few hundred dollars more. I'm now setting aside some money for the Nikon lens. When I have set aside enough, I will probably list my Tamron on ebay (I got it so cheaply I can probably make a profit on it anyway) and then use the proceeds to buy the Nikon at that time. What makes this choice for me is the fact that I enjoy taking action shots more than photographing non-moving subjects. Faster focus action, better VR, and a better chance of AF NOT getting lost with a large change in subject range all point me toward the Nikon. For non-moving or slow moving subjects, I'd keep the Tamron and never worry about it again. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Telephoto
First Test Drive of "The Stack": Nikkor 200-500 with a 1.4 TC on the D7100
Top