Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon Compact Digital Cameras
Non-Nikon Cameras
First shot with my LUMIX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elliot87" data-source="post: 462986" data-attributes="member: 25183"><p>I think what I'm trying to work out, is which is better. The small cropped area stuffed full of pixels but from an inferior camera, or that small cropped area with far fewer pixels but from a better camera. I think what I'm struggling to visualise is what size hole in the middle of the window, these bridge cameras leave me with at full zoom.</p><p></p><p>The second owl shot I posted was less than 3 mega pixels. If the P610 gave a comparable final image but was 16 mega pixels, that surely would result in a better image?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elliot87, post: 462986, member: 25183"] I think what I'm trying to work out, is which is better. The small cropped area stuffed full of pixels but from an inferior camera, or that small cropped area with far fewer pixels but from a better camera. I think what I'm struggling to visualise is what size hole in the middle of the window, these bridge cameras leave me with at full zoom. The second owl shot I posted was less than 3 mega pixels. If the P610 gave a comparable final image but was 16 mega pixels, that surely would result in a better image? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon Compact Digital Cameras
Non-Nikon Cameras
First shot with my LUMIX
Top