Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
First prime lens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DraganDL" data-source="post: 275985" data-attributes="member: 18251"><p>I find DXO lists inconsistent, very often (though I do consult their info, just the same). I saw REAL photos (on Flickr and elsewhere) and I compared (but, I admit, it's pretty subjective) the photos taken with AF-S 35 DX to those taken with AF 35D and to my opinion, the 35D works better. Many photographers are not aware of the fact that, among the other things, by using full frame lenses on DX bodies, you get way less vignetting too (the 35mm 1.8 DX has quite a high level of vignetting, besides exhibiting a high level of barrel distortion).</p><p></p><p>But don't get me wrong - I am not saying the 35mm 1.8 DX is a BAD lens (I wouldn't reject it, if someone would have offered it to me as a birthday present<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />).</p><p>---------------------------</p><p>On another note: yesterday I was offered the "good-old" venerable 35mm f/2 AIS ("full metal jacket" kind of build, with that coupling prong for the ancient Nikkormats and alike, ha, ha!), for about 100$. I think I'm gonna buy it, just for fun...</p><p>This one:</p><p>[ATTACH]76741[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DraganDL, post: 275985, member: 18251"] I find DXO lists inconsistent, very often (though I do consult their info, just the same). I saw REAL photos (on Flickr and elsewhere) and I compared (but, I admit, it's pretty subjective) the photos taken with AF-S 35 DX to those taken with AF 35D and to my opinion, the 35D works better. Many photographers are not aware of the fact that, among the other things, by using full frame lenses on DX bodies, you get way less vignetting too (the 35mm 1.8 DX has quite a high level of vignetting, besides exhibiting a high level of barrel distortion). But don't get me wrong - I am not saying the 35mm 1.8 DX is a BAD lens (I wouldn't reject it, if someone would have offered it to me as a birthday present;)). --------------------------- On another note: yesterday I was offered the "good-old" venerable 35mm f/2 AIS ("full metal jacket" kind of build, with that coupling prong for the ancient Nikkormats and alike, ha, ha!), for about 100$. I think I'm gonna buy it, just for fun... This one: [ATTACH=CONFIG]76741._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
First prime lens
Top