Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Portrait
First Baby Photography Shoot
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 257804" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>144 may be on the higher side but thats certainly not a lot. were not in the film era where you had to calvulate every picture. where you were cheap so you had enough film throughout the event. I can "create" pictures if there was only 1 picture. I could shoot 100 pictures of leaves, all useable and different angles. but dont only think composition, but add in lighting variation as well. </p><p></p><p>look at fashion photographers. they take one model, do hundreds of pictures for a photo shoot. different lighting, different poses, so whats 144 for a baby session of 3. a good photographer can always find a picture to create. in weddings my mind and eyes are all over sniping and creating. some are observers and others creators. I dont just document, I take initiative. im not passive and just look, im active and clearly in the middle of it. I also do a lot of candids as well. </p><p></p><p>so let me ask you how many pictures do you give for a <strong>full </strong>wedding? from beginning to the very end. from makup/hair, till theyre resting on the chair with their shoes off from exhaustion from dancing and all the guests have gone? because if you say anything less than 500, at the most minimum, you undershot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 257804, member: 14443"] 144 may be on the higher side but thats certainly not a lot. were not in the film era where you had to calvulate every picture. where you were cheap so you had enough film throughout the event. I can "create" pictures if there was only 1 picture. I could shoot 100 pictures of leaves, all useable and different angles. but dont only think composition, but add in lighting variation as well. look at fashion photographers. they take one model, do hundreds of pictures for a photo shoot. different lighting, different poses, so whats 144 for a baby session of 3. a good photographer can always find a picture to create. in weddings my mind and eyes are all over sniping and creating. some are observers and others creators. I dont just document, I take initiative. im not passive and just look, im active and clearly in the middle of it. I also do a lot of candids as well. so let me ask you how many pictures do you give for a [B]full [/B]wedding? from beginning to the very end. from makup/hair, till theyre resting on the chair with their shoes off from exhaustion from dancing and all the guests have gone? because if you say anything less than 500, at the most minimum, you undershot. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Portrait
First Baby Photography Shoot
Top