Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Filter or not
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="480sparky" data-source="post: 339435" data-attributes="member: 15805"><p>The article appears to make the case FOR using filters.</p><p></p><p>It can also be used to make the case AGAINST using filters for lens protection..... minor dings and scratches will have far far far fewer effects on the image than that damaged filter.</p><p></p><p>The simple fact that filters are much more fragile than lenses is what escapes most people who claim "the filter saved my lens". The only way to prove a broken filter 'saved' a lens is to subject the lens to the exact same conditions that broke the filter. In the case of accidents, that proves impossible.</p><p></p><p>And until someone does some emperical testing.... dropping lenses with and without filters under controlled circumstances.... with the filter giving it's all and the lens sustaining damage w/o a filter. Only then will I be convinced that filters actually 'save' lenses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="480sparky, post: 339435, member: 15805"] The article appears to make the case FOR using filters. It can also be used to make the case AGAINST using filters for lens protection..... minor dings and scratches will have far far far fewer effects on the image than that damaged filter. The simple fact that filters are much more fragile than lenses is what escapes most people who claim "the filter saved my lens". The only way to prove a broken filter 'saved' a lens is to subject the lens to the exact same conditions that broke the filter. In the case of accidents, that proves impossible. And until someone does some emperical testing.... dropping lenses with and without filters under controlled circumstances.... with the filter giving it's all and the lens sustaining damage w/o a filter. Only then will I be convinced that filters actually 'save' lenses. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Filter or not
Top