Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 766269" data-attributes="member: 9240">Folks have mentioned the probables here - different quality, compression, and/or ppi values when saving (something that is said to have been ruled out), and color space.If everything is truly the same on each then the only other thing I can think of is that the content of the images from one camera is consistently different enough that they exhibit more details and colors and therefore are less compressible when saved. A sample of each (RAW &amp; JPEG) might help, though I understand that you may not be able to do that publicly because of the content. If you want to PM me with a link to downloadable versions I'd be happy to look at them and see if I can figure it out before destroying them completely. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 766269, member: 9240"] Folks have mentioned the probables here - different quality, compression, and/or ppi values when saving (something that is said to have been ruled out), and color space. If everything is truly the same on each then the only other thing I can think of is that the content of the images from one camera is consistently different enough that they exhibit more details and colors and therefore are less compressible when saved. A sample of each (RAW & JPEG) might help, though I understand that you may not be able to do that publicly because of the content. If you want to PM me with a link to downloadable versions I'd be happy to look at them and see if I can figure it out before destroying them completely. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification