Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikonites
Weekly Photo Challenges
Faymus Media Photo Challenge #6 "Winners Battle Round #1" 4 Part Contest!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eye-level" data-source="post: 152613" data-attributes="member: 6548"><p><strong>Re: Faymus Media Photo Challenge #6 "Winners Battle Round #1" 4 Part Contest!</strong></p><p></p><p>OK what about all this "all pixels are not created equal" stuff then that they talk about about when comparing DX to FX...from what I see folks saying in regard to DX versus FX it seems like everyone says "Oh FX cameras are way superior to DX cameras the sensor is bigger and better." So how can it be that a 36 MP FX sensor is 90% of a MF digital sensor? Sounds fishy like marketing ploys to me.</p><p></p><p>Corey have you ever shot with one of the Hassy's? (I do not believe anything I read and only half of what I see) Where do you get this 90% of the quality figure? 10X better lowlight really? I thought bigger sensor meant better lowlight performance? You read this on the net or in a magazine?</p><p></p><p>Why do the most hotdog pro's in the world use the bigger than 24 X 36 digital formats? The photojournalist guys still use 35mm which is easy to see why but why do Vogue, Playboy, and GQ photographers use the big format?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eye-level, post: 152613, member: 6548"] [b]Re: Faymus Media Photo Challenge #6 "Winners Battle Round #1" 4 Part Contest![/b] OK what about all this "all pixels are not created equal" stuff then that they talk about about when comparing DX to FX...from what I see folks saying in regard to DX versus FX it seems like everyone says "Oh FX cameras are way superior to DX cameras the sensor is bigger and better." So how can it be that a 36 MP FX sensor is 90% of a MF digital sensor? Sounds fishy like marketing ploys to me. Corey have you ever shot with one of the Hassy's? (I do not believe anything I read and only half of what I see) Where do you get this 90% of the quality figure? 10X better lowlight really? I thought bigger sensor meant better lowlight performance? You read this on the net or in a magazine? Why do the most hotdog pro's in the world use the bigger than 24 X 36 digital formats? The photojournalist guys still use 35mm which is easy to see why but why do Vogue, Playboy, and GQ photographers use the big format? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikonites
Weekly Photo Challenges
Faymus Media Photo Challenge #6 "Winners Battle Round #1" 4 Part Contest!
Top