Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
faststone image viewer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 421020" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>I'm not saying LR won't be doing a better job but for JPEG alone, it's an expensive method if you can do the same with NX-D. You can do some changes indeed but the JPEG won't have any information you can pull out of it like a RAW file. I find 150$ an expensive price for just changing some JPEG pixels.</p><p></p><p>JPEG is a WYSIWYG format and if you're using LR for that, you can, as you said, just as easily switch to RAW and use LR and the cam to its full potential. You're doing the edits anyways.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 421020, member: 31330"] I'm not saying LR won't be doing a better job but for JPEG alone, it's an expensive method if you can do the same with NX-D. You can do some changes indeed but the JPEG won't have any information you can pull out of it like a RAW file. I find 150$ an expensive price for just changing some JPEG pixels. JPEG is a WYSIWYG format and if you're using LR for that, you can, as you said, just as easily switch to RAW and use LR and the cam to its full potential. You're doing the edits anyways. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Computers and Software
faststone image viewer
Top