Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
f2.8 or f4 for portraits?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lostnomore" data-source="post: 501306" data-attributes="member: 40922"><p>I'm considering a switch to Nikon at some point, but am really struggling with whether I should get the Nikkor AF-S 24-70 f2.8 or the 24-120 f4 for portraits. This isn't so much a question of zoom range but mostly maximum aperture and cost. I've done a lot of reading on this issue, and I've read a few people suggesting that it's worth it to just pony up the extra money to get the much-revered f2.8. But as users of these lenses here in this forum, is the f2.8 really that much better for portraiture, or is the f4 still very acceptable?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lostnomore, post: 501306, member: 40922"] I'm considering a switch to Nikon at some point, but am really struggling with whether I should get the Nikkor AF-S 24-70 f2.8 or the 24-120 f4 for portraits. This isn't so much a question of zoom range but mostly maximum aperture and cost. I've done a lot of reading on this issue, and I've read a few people suggesting that it's worth it to just pony up the extra money to get the much-revered f2.8. But as users of these lenses here in this forum, is the f2.8 really that much better for portraiture, or is the f4 still very acceptable? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
f2.8 or f4 for portraits?
Top
