Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Eye-level" data-source="post: 54918" data-attributes="member: 6548">Now that I think about it Marcel I would say anybody in their right mind who shoots film nowadays probably should invest in a good film scanner...I paid $15 to process develop and print 4X6 this roll...I got crappy scans too...if a person owned a scanner all you would need is processing...you can get the roll processed for like 5 bucks and then scan yourself...much more feasible in the long term scanner would pay for itself and you would get very good scans. Processing it going to get harder to find and more expensive but we are ok as long as they keep making disposable cameras...Funny you mention the Hasselblad I was just reading a book on the the Hasselblads...what an incredible camera...Victor took on a world where the 35mm was asserting it's dominance over the whole big field...Victor was a bird man and a scientist and he made a camera that was instantly loved by any photographer who held one in their hands...the 1600 F had a 1600 shutter speed so it could freeze a bird's wings in flight...pro photogs still use these the old Hasselblads to this very day and I don't care what anyone says I don't think the D800 can make a better picture performance envelope wise than a 500C...You'd probably have to mail 120 for processing unless you did it yourself...If you have a Hasselblad in your possession and you have the little blond haired blue eyed girl around you I'd say you are frigging absolutely crazy if you don't break it out...</blockquote>

Verification