Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
General Photography
Macro
Extension Tubes vs. Reversing Rings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dangerspouse" data-source="post: 703704" data-attributes="member: 46690"><p>I purchased my Nikon because my wife needed high quality macro shots of her products for inclusion in magazines, catalogs, and sales sheets, and neither her phone nor her little point-n-hope were cutting it. Because we were (are) on a budget, I got a used D3300 body, a used Nikkor 40mm micro lens, and an inexpensive light tent, table tripod, and a few other gadgets to get her up to speed.</p><p></p><p>The setup has worked very well for the last year or so, but there have been times where I wish I had a longer focal length lens so I could pull the camera body back a bit. The Nikkor 105mm Micro is really well out of reach at the moment, even used, so I'm looking to either pop one of my longer lenses on an extension tube (or 3), or try a reverse mount ring.</p><p></p><p>Does anyone have an opinion as to which produces better results? Any concerns about either one extant of actual picture quality? Neither option is particularly expensive, so whichever one produces the best photo - if indeed there is a clear winner - is the one I'll go for.</p><p></p><p>Thanks very much!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dangerspouse, post: 703704, member: 46690"] I purchased my Nikon because my wife needed high quality macro shots of her products for inclusion in magazines, catalogs, and sales sheets, and neither her phone nor her little point-n-hope were cutting it. Because we were (are) on a budget, I got a used D3300 body, a used Nikkor 40mm micro lens, and an inexpensive light tent, table tripod, and a few other gadgets to get her up to speed. The setup has worked very well for the last year or so, but there have been times where I wish I had a longer focal length lens so I could pull the camera body back a bit. The Nikkor 105mm Micro is really well out of reach at the moment, even used, so I'm looking to either pop one of my longer lenses on an extension tube (or 3), or try a reverse mount ring. Does anyone have an opinion as to which produces better results? Any concerns about either one extant of actual picture quality? Neither option is particularly expensive, so whichever one produces the best photo - if indeed there is a clear winner - is the one I'll go for. Thanks very much! [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Photography
Macro
Extension Tubes vs. Reversing Rings
Top