Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Explanation?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whiskeyman" data-source="post: 561342" data-attributes="member: 13556"><p>The answer is the same as before: depth of field limits. In addition, the obstruction is likely lighted unevenly, or has different shading, from near to far. (Possibly a piece of weatherstripping?) In addition, the far portion, that nearest the cat, is closer to being in focus than the rest of the obstruction, which is closer to the camera sensor. </p><p></p><p>I'm assuming that if you take a photo of the cat without the obstruction there is no line present. </p><p></p><p>WM</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whiskeyman, post: 561342, member: 13556"] The answer is the same as before: depth of field limits. In addition, the obstruction is likely lighted unevenly, or has different shading, from near to far. (Possibly a piece of weatherstripping?) In addition, the far portion, that nearest the cat, is closer to being in focus than the rest of the obstruction, which is closer to the camera sensor. I'm assuming that if you take a photo of the cat without the obstruction there is no line present. WM [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Explanation?
Top