Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Everyday lens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jwstl" data-source="post: 185556" data-attributes="member: 12977"><p>The question is which is more important to you right now:</p><p></p><p>Getting a lens with a focal range you don't have (17-50)</p><p>or improving the low light capabilities of the range you do have (35-70 range)</p><p></p><p>I chose the Sigma 17-50 over the Tamron 17-50 after reading a number of reviews and I like it a lot. It's been the standard lens on my D7000.</p><p>If I buy another DX lens it will be the Sigma 18-35 1.8. The focal range is small and it overlaps what I already have but having the more shallow DOF of 1.8 in that range is just too tempting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jwstl, post: 185556, member: 12977"] The question is which is more important to you right now: Getting a lens with a focal range you don't have (17-50) or improving the low light capabilities of the range you do have (35-70 range) I chose the Sigma 17-50 over the Tamron 17-50 after reading a number of reviews and I like it a lot. It's been the standard lens on my D7000. If I buy another DX lens it will be the Sigma 18-35 1.8. The focal range is small and it overlaps what I already have but having the more shallow DOF of 1.8 in that range is just too tempting. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Everyday lens
Top
