Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 308084" data-attributes="member: 12496">You are speaking of exposure.&nbsp; The EV chart does not mention ISO or exposure.&nbsp; The EV chart is a different subject than exposure.It is internet, but&nbsp;&nbsp; Wikipedia has the strong advantage of many readers/editors trying to keep it corrected.&nbsp; Bad stuff does not stand for long.Most web pages have one single source, not correctable.&nbsp;&nbsp; Most are pretty good, but not every one of them knows what they are talking about. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Anyone can put anything on the internet.&nbsp; Reader beware.&nbsp; Reading more to achieve a wider consensus is always good.&nbsp;&nbsp; But if short of time, Wikipedia is a good way to bet.Yes, agreed, that is also what I said.&nbsp; &quot;but if to suggest EV 15 is any specific exposure, then we have to specify at which ISO we imply.&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 308084, member: 12496"] You are speaking of exposure. The EV chart does not mention ISO or exposure. The EV chart is a different subject than exposure. It is internet, but Wikipedia has the strong advantage of many readers/editors trying to keep it corrected. Bad stuff does not stand for long. Most web pages have one single source, not correctable. Most are pretty good, but not every one of them knows what they are talking about. :) Anyone can put anything on the internet. Reader beware. Reading more to achieve a wider consensus is always good. But if short of time, Wikipedia is a good way to bet. Yes, agreed, that is also what I said. "but if to suggest EV 15 is any specific exposure, then we have to specify at which ISO we imply." [/QUOTE]

Verification