Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="gustafson" data-source="post: 503663" data-attributes="member: 40735">Paul, thanks for the detailed response, looks like I have some great reading ahead of me this weekend [emoji4] But sincerely, much appreciated!That last bit made sense to me. I'm guessing the rationale is our cameras can tell us if we're blowing pixels, but not if our shadows are too dark to recover from, so we're better off working backward from inside the edge of blown highlights. Also seems logical that we would use as much of the light available to us as possible (as it is information about the image) as opposed to dialing it down and losing image data. Ha! I'm starting to sound like a pro already [emoji23]Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</blockquote>