Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Education
DXO Mark - Should They Be Trusted?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 445105" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>You are absolutely correct. What u interpret will be different thab what i interpret. Numbers are too geekiness for photography. Theres a lot of small finer thibgs to measure than numbers. Theres small aesthetics numbers dorsnt show. </p><p></p><p>Im saying i dont trust anyones word. No one. They all have their wallets in mind. All i care is to see the images. </p><p>Show me the pictures u took so i can assess it with my own eyes. Numbers wont tell me anything it doesnt translate to an image. And besides dxomark are liars imo. Nikon is a client and pay dxomark. Not possible the canon cameras place so low on the charts. Thats quite nonsense.</p><p></p><p>Relaize the dumb trend of the "real world testibg" theyve been releasibg. What? Before it wasn't the real world? Its all a market of people wanting u to click their sponsored links so they make some money</p><p></p><p>Notice rockwell never says anything bad about any gear today? Why? Because its in his wallets interest to psych u up to buy and potentially use his links so he can cash in. And all the reviewers are the same. There is no review today that isnt done for profit. Dxomark included</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 445105, member: 14443"] You are absolutely correct. What u interpret will be different thab what i interpret. Numbers are too geekiness for photography. Theres a lot of small finer thibgs to measure than numbers. Theres small aesthetics numbers dorsnt show. Im saying i dont trust anyones word. No one. They all have their wallets in mind. All i care is to see the images. Show me the pictures u took so i can assess it with my own eyes. Numbers wont tell me anything it doesnt translate to an image. And besides dxomark are liars imo. Nikon is a client and pay dxomark. Not possible the canon cameras place so low on the charts. Thats quite nonsense. Relaize the dumb trend of the "real world testibg" theyve been releasibg. What? Before it wasn't the real world? Its all a market of people wanting u to click their sponsored links so they make some money Notice rockwell never says anything bad about any gear today? Why? Because its in his wallets interest to psych u up to buy and potentially use his links so he can cash in. And all the reviewers are the same. There is no review today that isnt done for profit. Dxomark included [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Education
DXO Mark - Should They Be Trusted?
Top