Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BackdoorArts" data-source="post: 291149" data-attributes="member: 9240">I thought they made some firmware changes for WB, which I'm guessing could impact other aspects of image sharpness.&nbsp; Differences like this are completely ignorable, in my opinion.&nbsp; I know people love to fawn over what these numbers are when weighing the &quot;better&quot; question, but having done side-by-side comparisons almost daily on real world shots with both a D600 and D800 I can conclusively tell you that they're both great cameras and some days I prefer one over the other, and some days I don't care which I shoot with.&nbsp; But if you need to know, they compare 72.5 vs. 72.7 on the JakeMark, which no one has bothered to subscribe to because I charge too much.&nbsp; And you'll have to pay up before I tell you which is which. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="BackdoorArts, post: 291149, member: 9240"] I thought they made some firmware changes for WB, which I'm guessing could impact other aspects of image sharpness. Differences like this are completely ignorable, in my opinion. I know people love to fawn over what these numbers are when weighing the "better" question, but having done side-by-side comparisons almost daily on real world shots with both a D600 and D800 I can conclusively tell you that they're both great cameras and some days I prefer one over the other, and some days I don't care which I shoot with. But if you need to know, they compare 72.5 vs. 72.7 on the JakeMark, which no one has bothered to subscribe to because I charge too much. And you'll have to pay up before I tell you which is which. ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification