Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
DX Lens on a Z Full-frame Body?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="billpics" data-source="post: 829637" data-attributes="member: 55747"><p>I am still trying to come up with an <em>affordable</em> solution to get more telephoto reach on a Z5. Budget is limited in my twilight years. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /> </p><p></p><p>1. A used 70-300mm AF-P and FTZ would come to $700-$750 (tax and shipping). Not interested in the older AF-S version.</p><p></p><p>2. A refurb Z 24-200mm from Nikon runs $780 with tax. Seems like a lot of money for limited reach.</p><p></p><p>3. A used Z 24-200mm from Roberts comes to $575 (tax and shipping).</p><p></p><p>4. Downside of using the <strong>Z 50-250mm DX</strong> lens on FF body? Would a 10MB file be unsuitable for web publishing? Would the IQ of a smaller area of a FF sensor somehow be unacceptable?</p><p></p><p>I’ve been at this since 1970 and used all cameras and formats up to 8x10 professionally. The last several years I lived in Europe and relied upon a D500 with the 70-300 AF-P DX, and the IQ was decent enough to post 5MB images on Unsplash.</p><p></p><p>So, because of this experience, I’m wondering if the <strong>Z 50-250mm DX</strong> could be a workable and affordable solution for general purpose photography? </p><p></p><p>Thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="billpics, post: 829637, member: 55747"] I am still trying to come up with an [I]affordable[/I] solution to get more telephoto reach on a Z5. Budget is limited in my twilight years. :( 1. A used 70-300mm AF-P and FTZ would come to $700-$750 (tax and shipping). Not interested in the older AF-S version. 2. A refurb Z 24-200mm from Nikon runs $780 with tax. Seems like a lot of money for limited reach. 3. A used Z 24-200mm from Roberts comes to $575 (tax and shipping). 4. Downside of using the [B]Z 50-250mm DX[/B] lens on FF body? Would a 10MB file be unsuitable for web publishing? Would the IQ of a smaller area of a FF sensor somehow be unacceptable? I’ve been at this since 1970 and used all cameras and formats up to 8x10 professionally. The last several years I lived in Europe and relied upon a D500 with the 70-300 AF-P DX, and the IQ was decent enough to post 5MB images on Unsplash. So, because of this experience, I’m wondering if the [B]Z 50-250mm DX[/B] could be a workable and affordable solution for general purpose photography? Thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
DX Lens on a Z Full-frame Body?
Top