Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="pendennis" data-source="post: 579902" data-attributes="member: 42413">When I went digital with the D200, I already had a battery of lenses I used with my F5 and N90s.&nbsp; Since the D200 is FX, I just got used to using the FX lenses without trying any of the DX offerings.&nbsp;&nbsp; I bought a D500 in early June, and ended up buying a few DX lenses for it.&nbsp; In July, I bought a D750, because I believe that just shooting the &quot;center&quot; of the lens in DX, was wasting the capacity of the lens.&nbsp; The D750 has been a great addition, and it's becoming my &quot;go to&quot; camera, especially with the Nikkor 200-500 f5.6, and the newer 70-200 f4.One of the assets of the D750, is that using DX lenses will cause it to &quot;revert&quot; to DX format.&nbsp; Just more versatility.I'm still delving into the capabilities of both bodies.As to the GAS, I'm resisting the urge to invest in a 70-300mm VR.&nbsp; It does go away, but the urge is mighty.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="pendennis, post: 579902, member: 42413"] When I went digital with the D200, I already had a battery of lenses I used with my F5 and N90s. Since the D200 is FX, I just got used to using the FX lenses without trying any of the DX offerings. I bought a D500 in early June, and ended up buying a few DX lenses for it. In July, I bought a D750, because I believe that just shooting the "center" of the lens in DX, was wasting the capacity of the lens. The D750 has been a great addition, and it's becoming my "go to" camera, especially with the Nikkor 200-500 f5.6, and the newer 70-200 f4. One of the assets of the D750, is that using DX lenses will cause it to "revert" to DX format. Just more versatility. I'm still delving into the capabilities of both bodies. As to the GAS, I'm resisting the urge to invest in a 70-300mm VR. It does go away, but the urge is mighty. [/QUOTE]

Verification