Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
DSLR use in Pro Video to Plummet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 476336" data-attributes="member: 14443"><p>yes, I too agree. Im not saying nikon has to do this now. I think 4k is way too early. in fact for weddings, the couples dont even get true 1080p/bluray. hardly any editor has one because the couple dont ask and dont know. were talking about 5%, maybe 7 who have a BR player at home and the quality is very good in mkv or whatever the hell they output too. 4k is not now. at least another 2 year period before it will be needed for weddings. the tv industry pushes it, but when u ask the couples what 4k is, no one knows WTH it is. an investment in pc hardware just to deal wih the huge files. it has some way to go. and 4k isnt aesthetic when shooting the bride in closeup. you see every pore and heavy caked on foundation she has on. it really isnt pleasing. </p><p></p><p>nikon finally woke up with the d810/750. they have nice tools inside that were needed a long time ago. they now have a good codec inside as well. imo, sony is leading currently, canon is up at bat and will deliver the 5d4 soon. they are the dominant camera used by most videographers at weddings today. nikon needs to get into it too. I see so many sell their nikon gear to move to canon for video. theres a huge demand for good dslr videographers. they make more than stills. there are not stop posts on a FB group im on where people are always looking for one. its why I want to do video as well. nonstop work. I can double my income. </p><p></p><p>I love the look of dslr video thats like stills. the selective focus the low light capability to capture things in a natural way, compared to the older style shoulder cams which need tons of light. the style of shooting is also different. with dslr wedding videogs shoot short clips. theyre not walking and recording for 20 minutes footages. they shoot a minute here, three there. moving with their monopod or stabilization system, recording and then again. its a different kind of mindset of filming then it was.</p><p> @<a href="http://nikonites.com/member-25095-rocketcowboy.html" target="_blank">RocketCowboy</a> D5300 is a fantastic camera. stop bitching. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> it only takes but a split second to record, stop, record and you do it when you sense there is a break somewhere. videographers do it all the time when shooting the wedding ceremony. you handhold yours or monopod/tripod?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 476336, member: 14443"] yes, I too agree. Im not saying nikon has to do this now. I think 4k is way too early. in fact for weddings, the couples dont even get true 1080p/bluray. hardly any editor has one because the couple dont ask and dont know. were talking about 5%, maybe 7 who have a BR player at home and the quality is very good in mkv or whatever the hell they output too. 4k is not now. at least another 2 year period before it will be needed for weddings. the tv industry pushes it, but when u ask the couples what 4k is, no one knows WTH it is. an investment in pc hardware just to deal wih the huge files. it has some way to go. and 4k isnt aesthetic when shooting the bride in closeup. you see every pore and heavy caked on foundation she has on. it really isnt pleasing. nikon finally woke up with the d810/750. they have nice tools inside that were needed a long time ago. they now have a good codec inside as well. imo, sony is leading currently, canon is up at bat and will deliver the 5d4 soon. they are the dominant camera used by most videographers at weddings today. nikon needs to get into it too. I see so many sell their nikon gear to move to canon for video. theres a huge demand for good dslr videographers. they make more than stills. there are not stop posts on a FB group im on where people are always looking for one. its why I want to do video as well. nonstop work. I can double my income. I love the look of dslr video thats like stills. the selective focus the low light capability to capture things in a natural way, compared to the older style shoulder cams which need tons of light. the style of shooting is also different. with dslr wedding videogs shoot short clips. theyre not walking and recording for 20 minutes footages. they shoot a minute here, three there. moving with their monopod or stabilization system, recording and then again. its a different kind of mindset of filming then it was. @[URL="http://nikonites.com/member-25095-rocketcowboy.html"]RocketCowboy[/URL] D5300 is a fantastic camera. stop bitching. :D it only takes but a split second to record, stop, record and you do it when you sense there is a break somewhere. videographers do it all the time when shooting the wedding ceremony. you handhold yours or monopod/tripod? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
DSLR use in Pro Video to Plummet
Top