Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
DSLR Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="aroy" data-source="post: 622005" data-attributes="member: 16090"><p>I think that to a certain extent "Live View" can be qualify as an EVF. The problem with EVF in the current cameras is</p><p>. They are slower than OVF as the electronics has to refresh the scene at least 20 times a second</p><p>. They have more time lag compared to DSLR (even though the DSLR takes some time to shift the mirror physically)</p><p>. They consume a lot of battery power. This is especially crucial in extreme cold climates, as well as in the tropical heat. With a modern DSLR 700 shots per battery charge are easy and without VR most bodies top 1000+. With EVF you get barely 300 shots if you are lucky.</p><p></p><p>With more advance in battery technology, sensor response and cooling EVF/Liveview will catch up, and then we may see the demise of the Mirror box in the DSLR, till then DSLR rules.</p><p></p><p>OT</p><p>With 30+fps 8k video capability just around the corner, users may be satisfied with extracting frames from the video and that will spell the demise of lower MP DSLR.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="aroy, post: 622005, member: 16090"] I think that to a certain extent "Live View" can be qualify as an EVF. The problem with EVF in the current cameras is . They are slower than OVF as the electronics has to refresh the scene at least 20 times a second . They have more time lag compared to DSLR (even though the DSLR takes some time to shift the mirror physically) . They consume a lot of battery power. This is especially crucial in extreme cold climates, as well as in the tropical heat. With a modern DSLR 700 shots per battery charge are easy and without VR most bodies top 1000+. With EVF you get barely 300 shots if you are lucky. With more advance in battery technology, sensor response and cooling EVF/Liveview will catch up, and then we may see the demise of the Mirror box in the DSLR, till then DSLR rules. OT With 30+fps 8k video capability just around the corner, users may be satisfied with extracting frames from the video and that will spell the demise of lower MP DSLR. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
DSLR Question
Top