Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Does wider zoom range mean lower image quality?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snowcat" data-source="post: 644201" data-attributes="member: 44121"><p>While there IS such tendency, it is not a law. Latest ultrazoom lenses, Tamron 16-300 PZD and Sigma 18-300 C show very impressive results, better then many much shorter zooms... I owned 16-300 on Sony, I own Sigma 18-300 now so I know what I am talking about. And Sigma 50-100/1.8 has better IQ then many primes have... Technology is not standing still <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snowcat, post: 644201, member: 44121"] While there IS such tendency, it is not a law. Latest ultrazoom lenses, Tamron 16-300 PZD and Sigma 18-300 C show very impressive results, better then many much shorter zooms... I owned 16-300 on Sony, I own Sigma 18-300 now so I know what I am talking about. And Sigma 50-100/1.8 has better IQ then many primes have... Technology is not standing still :) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Does wider zoom range mean lower image quality?
Top
