Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 204269" data-attributes="member: 12496">My notion is that I could never consider replacing the 70-200, or the 24-70.   I use those at every opportunity, it does not get better than that.  IMO, these are the ultimate goal. I don't know about the 28-300, but I do also have a 24-120 which is great for walk-around-all-day-with-one-lens, and it's very good on FX, but 24mm is a poor choice on DX, no wide angle.  The 28-300 is a 10x zoom range, where 24-120 is only 5x.  10x is really not a plus regarding optical quality.  Neither of these is f/2.8, which helps when shooting at f/4, but we can't always have everything.  <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>