Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Does Anyone Use Adobe Camera Raw or Adobe Bridge?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Horoscope Fish" data-source="post: 615260" data-attributes="member: 13090"><p>I absolutely agree. From a purely editing standpoint the Develop module of Lightroom is, for all intents and purposes, Camera Raw with a modified user interface. There are a few things LR can do, such as presets, that can not be done in ACR. To my way of thinking there are much bigger differences between Lightroom and Photoshop than there are between Lightroom and Adobe Camera Raw. </p><p></p><p>In my mind there are two basic paths with Adobe: The Path of Lightroom or the Path of Bridge/ACR/Photoshop. I would be more inclined to use the Lightroom Path if I was editing a LOT of images ALL the time; it strikes me more as a <em>production</em> sort of workflow. The Bridge/ACR/Photoshop workflow, to me anyway, feels like a more <em>artistic</em> sort of flow where you're working on fewer images but doing more with each one individually, such as retouching. That's not to say those who are artistically inclined can't have a LR-based workflow, or that production minded photographers can't use a Bridge/ACR/Photoshop workflow, however. That's just how the two different workflows have felt to me when I used them. I know a few professionals who integrate ALL of these applications (Bridge, Lightroom, ACR, Photoshop) and other applications as well (such as Illustrator or InDesign) into their workflow, but they're Masters of their Craft in my eye's. </p><p><span style="color: #FFFFFF">.....</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Horoscope Fish, post: 615260, member: 13090"] I absolutely agree. From a purely editing standpoint the Develop module of Lightroom is, for all intents and purposes, Camera Raw with a modified user interface. There are a few things LR can do, such as presets, that can not be done in ACR. To my way of thinking there are much bigger differences between Lightroom and Photoshop than there are between Lightroom and Adobe Camera Raw. In my mind there are two basic paths with Adobe: The Path of Lightroom or the Path of Bridge/ACR/Photoshop. I would be more inclined to use the Lightroom Path if I was editing a LOT of images ALL the time; it strikes me more as a [I]production[/I] sort of workflow. The Bridge/ACR/Photoshop workflow, to me anyway, feels like a more [I]artistic[/I] sort of flow where you're working on fewer images but doing more with each one individually, such as retouching. That's not to say those who are artistically inclined can't have a LR-based workflow, or that production minded photographers can't use a Bridge/ACR/Photoshop workflow, however. That's just how the two different workflows have felt to me when I used them. I know a few professionals who integrate ALL of these applications (Bridge, Lightroom, ACR, Photoshop) and other applications as well (such as Illustrator or InDesign) into their workflow, but they're Masters of their Craft in my eye's. [COLOR="#FFFFFF"].....[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Does Anyone Use Adobe Camera Raw or Adobe Bridge?
Top