Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jay_dean" data-source="post: 399857" data-attributes="member: 34040"><p>When i'm at airshows and doing the long range stuff, i have the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 on one camera body, (takes-offs) and a super tele lens on another. Other than those events, i don't often take the 70-200 far tbh, its always a super tele for hikes and stuff. I could only justify one lens in that kind of range, and i'd only really use one lens in that range, and if i wanted to buy the 120-300, the 70-200 would have to fund it. The extra reach of that 300mm would be very handy for me, and thats the tempting part, but is the 120-300 the equal in speed and IQ of the Nikon 70-200 2.8?? I dunno</p></blockquote><p></p>