Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="T-Man" data-source="post: 476098" data-attributes="member: 22038">Nice crawfish there, champ.Really, who gives a sh** what's going on in the background and why, and whether or not WB is "in the RAW file?" That's a silly semantic exercise you seem hung up on, obviously to further obfuscate the fact you're very clearly talking out your azz about something you've never tried. You've got some congenital need to prove stuff to anonymous people on the internet for some perceived power trip. Were you picked on a lot in grade school? What matters is WB certainly gets imported over to Adobe somehow. Osmosis perhaps? Who the &*$! cares how; it manages to magically get imported, as I demonstrated above. If I consistently get a more accurate WB result using the ED vs. other methods (and I most certainly DO, despite your hand-wringing protestations to the contrary), why do I care how it magically happened? Whether WB is absolutely correct 100% time or not is certainly debatable, but I consistently prefer the result I get with the ED, and I tweak skin tones in post much less after I began using it. Why is that not a desirable outcome? What is the disadvantage to using it? if it works, it works; why should I care why? On the rare occasions it didn't work out, what's the big deal? Hell, I spend more than $50 on a typical evening at the movies with my wife and daughter! I highly recommend you DO NOT buy one of these Expodisk pieces of sh**!!!!!!!!!! Is that better? I thought you were through commenting on the topic by the way.You really told me off! I'll somehow recover and manage to carry on with some shred of dignity intact.</blockquote>

Verification