Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
do you use a white balance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneF" data-source="post: 476093" data-attributes="member: 12496"><p>I didn't say that. And I use ACR a lot, for a long time. I said there is certainly no WB in the raw file data, but the Adobe raw default (which can be changed) is to try to obtain As Shot WB, where it tries to decipher camera WB (which is not in raw) from the Exif (where it is, even if it is not in raw data), which it applies to the RGB image we see in ACR. </p><p></p><p>And my belief is that it has difficulty deciphering that just right. Not grossly wrong, but just not right. At least not to my satisfaction. Which I do not blame on Adobe. </p><p></p><p>Other camera settings (Picture Control color, contrast, etc) are not in raw either, and Adobe does not try to match them, but Adobe does have its defaults for them (which can be changed). One raw difference is we make such settings later after we see the image, instead of hopeful wishing long before we even see the scene.</p><p></p><p>So camera WB is totally unimportant to me anyway, it's easier to work with it in Raw, after we can actually see what's needed, and see what helps, and try different things, etc. Its easier and better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneF, post: 476093, member: 12496"] I didn't say that. And I use ACR a lot, for a long time. I said there is certainly no WB in the raw file data, but the Adobe raw default (which can be changed) is to try to obtain As Shot WB, where it tries to decipher camera WB (which is not in raw) from the Exif (where it is, even if it is not in raw data), which it applies to the RGB image we see in ACR. And my belief is that it has difficulty deciphering that just right. Not grossly wrong, but just not right. At least not to my satisfaction. Which I do not blame on Adobe. Other camera settings (Picture Control color, contrast, etc) are not in raw either, and Adobe does not try to match them, but Adobe does have its defaults for them (which can be changed). One raw difference is we make such settings later after we see the image, instead of hopeful wishing long before we even see the scene. So camera WB is totally unimportant to me anyway, it's easier to work with it in Raw, after we can actually see what's needed, and see what helps, and try different things, etc. Its easier and better. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
do you use a white balance?
Top