Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Do better lenses result in better photographs?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elliot87" data-source="post: 554807" data-attributes="member: 25183"><p>I did find something similar to this when I used both my Tamron 70-300mm VC and Nikkor 55mm 2.8 macro lens to photograph the same fledgling sparrow. In this case those I would say the 55mm is probably the better lens, it's certainly much sharper but I did have to manual focus with it and heavily crop afterwards. I was quite surprised by the results and it was one of the major moments that made me realise I needed a sharper telephoto for wildlife.</p><p></p><p>The first shot is from the 70-300mm and is either the full image or a very slight crop but I think the former, second shot is 55mm heavily cropped. Both images taken at a similar distance from the sparrow.</p><p></p><p>70-300mm</p><p>[ATTACH=full]210461[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>55mm crop</p><p>[ATTACH=full]210462[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>55mm full image to show degree of crop.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]210463[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>I was surprised by how similar they were in sharpness, especially considering that is a decent result for the70-300mm. I do prefer the 70-300 image because of the more out of focus background but as you found a sharp 55mm crop can at least match a shot from a less sharp longer lens.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elliot87, post: 554807, member: 25183"] I did find something similar to this when I used both my Tamron 70-300mm VC and Nikkor 55mm 2.8 macro lens to photograph the same fledgling sparrow. In this case those I would say the 55mm is probably the better lens, it's certainly much sharper but I did have to manual focus with it and heavily crop afterwards. I was quite surprised by the results and it was one of the major moments that made me realise I needed a sharper telephoto for wildlife. The first shot is from the 70-300mm and is either the full image or a very slight crop but I think the former, second shot is 55mm heavily cropped. Both images taken at a similar distance from the sparrow. 70-300mm [ATTACH type="full"]210461._xfImport[/ATTACH] 55mm crop [ATTACH type="full"]210462._xfImport[/ATTACH] 55mm full image to show degree of crop. [ATTACH type="full" width="30%"]210463._xfImport[/ATTACH] I was surprised by how similar they were in sharpness, especially considering that is a decent result for the70-300mm. I do prefer the 70-300 image because of the more out of focus background but as you found a sharp 55mm crop can at least match a shot from a less sharp longer lens. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Do better lenses result in better photographs?
Top