Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Education
Diffraction limited pixels... Really?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stoshowicz" data-source="post: 363389" data-attributes="member: 31397"><p>This commonly used lens ( I checked last night) only goes to f32. Assume the focus is properly centered. Shutter speed is 1-250th of a sec ( sync speed) the iso is 200, and any additional light needed is to be supplied with the on camera flash.</p><p></p><p>Yes I agree that Wayne's point on the significance of the diffraction plays a part in defining that which would be optimum.</p><p>and Yes I think that physically altering distance will also play a part in the calculation , both of which are why DoF calculators dont answer the question.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stoshowicz, post: 363389, member: 31397"] This commonly used lens ( I checked last night) only goes to f32. Assume the focus is properly centered. Shutter speed is 1-250th of a sec ( sync speed) the iso is 200, and any additional light needed is to be supplied with the on camera flash. Yes I agree that Wayne's point on the significance of the diffraction plays a part in defining that which would be optimum. and Yes I think that physically altering distance will also play a part in the calculation , both of which are why DoF calculators dont answer the question. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Education
Diffraction limited pixels... Really?
Top