Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Education
Diffraction limited pixels... Really?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eyelight" data-source="post: 363313" data-attributes="member: 24753"><p>If we stop and think about the images we take and the ones that are in the box (throw back from Kodachrome), there are not that many that diffraction is going to impact. Here is why. Sharpness is relative to blur. There are images with blurry subjects that look great because the background is blurrier. There are very few images that every single square nanometer is perfectly sharp, so we are fine with blur and use it every day to our advantage.</p><p></p><p>One other reason, is the only focused part of an image is the focal plane. The DOF in front and behind the focal plane is falling off immediate; just doesn't get unacceptably sharp til the front and back edge of the DOF, which is arbitrary depending on what you plan to do with an image.</p><p></p><p>However, good to understand the things that impact every aspect of what I'm trying to do.</p><p></p><p>Good discussion. Good questions and replies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eyelight, post: 363313, member: 24753"] If we stop and think about the images we take and the ones that are in the box (throw back from Kodachrome), there are not that many that diffraction is going to impact. Here is why. Sharpness is relative to blur. There are images with blurry subjects that look great because the background is blurrier. There are very few images that every single square nanometer is perfectly sharp, so we are fine with blur and use it every day to our advantage. One other reason, is the only focused part of an image is the focal plane. The DOF in front and behind the focal plane is falling off immediate; just doesn't get unacceptably sharp til the front and back edge of the DOF, which is arbitrary depending on what you plan to do with an image. However, good to understand the things that impact every aspect of what I'm trying to do. Good discussion. Good questions and replies. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Education
Diffraction limited pixels... Really?
Top