Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Differences among editors
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cbay" data-source="post: 452893" data-attributes="member: 35177"><p>Bear in mind i'm very new to the post process, but the difference between an image run through Capture first and out as a tiff before editing in Lr is a big deal. The example i used in the before and after thread was on the high end of an example and they were both edited differently in Lr, but the color depth and detail is very hard to ignore. </p><p>The only thing iv'e done in Capture is use it to preserve the color profile, no other editing just doing a batch process for a folder of images or a conversion with an image into tiff for edit in Lr.</p><p>Maybe it's because i'm a juvenile in post workflow experience, but from what i'm seeing it should be of interest to others.</p><p>If you go to Nikon's Capture web page they refer to using it and then moving the file(s) as 16 bit tiffs to other editors; so evidently they are aware of photographers wanting to take advantage of some benefits.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cbay, post: 452893, member: 35177"] Bear in mind i'm very new to the post process, but the difference between an image run through Capture first and out as a tiff before editing in Lr is a big deal. The example i used in the before and after thread was on the high end of an example and they were both edited differently in Lr, but the color depth and detail is very hard to ignore. The only thing iv'e done in Capture is use it to preserve the color profile, no other editing just doing a batch process for a folder of images or a conversion with an image into tiff for edit in Lr. Maybe it's because i'm a juvenile in post workflow experience, but from what i'm seeing it should be of interest to others. If you go to Nikon's Capture web page they refer to using it and then moving the file(s) as 16 bit tiffs to other editors; so evidently they are aware of photographers wanting to take advantage of some benefits. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Differences among editors
Top