Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Differences among editors
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 452758" data-attributes="member: 31330"><p>I'm still trying to make sense of some differences.</p><p></p><p>The massive difference in file size has to do with calculations I assume. The engine behind the editors defines how accurate the calculations are and how fast different values "melt" together and result in loss in detail. It's (usually) not massive mind you. The processing done in capture is different because Nikon is an arse when it comes to non-Nikon lenses and it does not correct anything in Capture. If you convert them as TiFF for another editor, you have to use the lens corrections there else all distortions remain.</p><p></p><p>For the rest there are differences in tones between all versions which was to be expected. The loss of data too which is likely either in the highlights, shadows or both. From what I get out of the image analyser I'd gamble on highlights.</p><p></p><p>For me the important part is to now see that when I convert the D7200 to Tiff, I still have to use lens profiles in RT. If I use non-Nikon lenses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-see, post: 452758, member: 31330"] I'm still trying to make sense of some differences. The massive difference in file size has to do with calculations I assume. The engine behind the editors defines how accurate the calculations are and how fast different values "melt" together and result in loss in detail. It's (usually) not massive mind you. The processing done in capture is different because Nikon is an arse when it comes to non-Nikon lenses and it does not correct anything in Capture. If you convert them as TiFF for another editor, you have to use the lens corrections there else all distortions remain. For the rest there are differences in tones between all versions which was to be expected. The loss of data too which is likely either in the highlights, shadows or both. From what I get out of the image analyser I'd gamble on highlights. For me the important part is to now see that when I convert the D7200 to Tiff, I still have to use lens profiles in RT. If I use non-Nikon lenses. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Differences among editors
Top