Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
Prime
difference between all these 105mm lenses??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 381186" data-attributes="member: 13196"><p>As far as the volume of Nikon's VR compared with Sigma's OS, my Nikon 70-300mm and my previous Sigma 70-200mm both had very quiet VR/OS. My Nikon 105mm and my current Nikon 70-200mm have somewhat noisy VR--and both lenses are new. The 105mm was purchased last fall but rarely used with VR. My current Nikon 70-200mm is used on a tripod due to its weight and my forearm tendonitis. </p><p></p><p>I'd suggest trying out both the Sigma and the Nikon at a store to see how much difference in volume you hear between the VR/OS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hark, post: 381186, member: 13196"] As far as the volume of Nikon's VR compared with Sigma's OS, my Nikon 70-300mm and my previous Sigma 70-200mm both had very quiet VR/OS. My Nikon 105mm and my current Nikon 70-200mm have somewhat noisy VR--and both lenses are new. The 105mm was purchased last fall but rarely used with VR. My current Nikon 70-200mm is used on a tripod due to its weight and my forearm tendonitis. I'd suggest trying out both the Sigma and the Nikon at a store to see how much difference in volume you hear between the VR/OS. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
Prime
difference between all these 105mm lenses??
Top
