Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="hark" data-source="post: 302347" data-attributes="member: 13196">Nick, now that you mention your link, I do remember reading about it! Thanks for sharing it! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Dave, Sparky, Nick, and Marcel, thank you for the info. I do understand what all of you are saying and how that shutter speed doesn't change the light that is already there--it just freezes it to a nano second to produce what our eyes can't see naturally. The other video photos I shot had a combination of pale green and pale pink (with longer shutter speeds) and a medium green and medium pinkish mauve for an in between shutter speed. The discussion also reminded me that light is a frequency and has an amplitude just like a sound frequency.I'm not allowed to use flash during the student productions, but it does make me wonder how flash might affect the color of a video's photo. I'm especially wondering how different of an effect it might create when taking photos under direct fluorescent lighting then comparing how the video's flicker rate factors into the equation. I'm not going to test it out though! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

Verification