Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Diagnostic question?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="thequintessentialman" data-source="post: 629211" data-attributes="member: 32750"><p>Blacktop and Blade, you have answered my question. I missed it in Blade's the first reading. I'm using my phone and over looked some stuff on this screen too small to be viewed by humans. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>Either RAW or PP.. Typically PP does not fix fuzzy. The shots can be cleaned up but I can't use a pic from the Nikon at same scale as the Sig; IS is not there. The Sigma is a good lens for the money but no way it's sharper than your 200-500. </p><p></p><p>Already own both lenses and shoot pretty much everything you mentioned. I typically shoot people, events, and everything else with the Nikon, and wildlife with Sigma. Been playing around with Sigma on macro just because it's sharper than the Nikon... and I was curious. Until the Sig, the Nikon was pretty much what I had for lenses. Was wanting to get a short Tele prime until the Nikon issue...</p><p></p><p>Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="thequintessentialman, post: 629211, member: 32750"] Blacktop and Blade, you have answered my question. I missed it in Blade's the first reading. I'm using my phone and over looked some stuff on this screen too small to be viewed by humans. :) Either RAW or PP.. Typically PP does not fix fuzzy. The shots can be cleaned up but I can't use a pic from the Nikon at same scale as the Sig; IS is not there. The Sigma is a good lens for the money but no way it's sharper than your 200-500. Already own both lenses and shoot pretty much everything you mentioned. I typically shoot people, events, and everything else with the Nikon, and wildlife with Sigma. Been playing around with Sigma on macro just because it's sharper than the Nikon... and I was curious. Until the Sig, the Nikon was pretty much what I had for lenses. Was wanting to get a short Tele prime until the Nikon issue... Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Lenses
General Lenses
Diagnostic question?
Top