Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Denoise software options
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nikonbill" data-source="post: 845995" data-attributes="member: 47024"><p>I see you have had no responses for a while. I can add some input on my own de-noising adventures. </p><p></p><p>I also have Topaz photo AI and a working copy (for now) of topaz Photo (the new one) I let that subscription run out last spring I'm at V1.3.3but it still functions. Topaz AI and photo work similar for most noisy photos I use it on regarding de-noise. What I do not like is the smoothing of pixels Topaz does to de noise, on many photos this looks worse to me than a "little" left over nose (I try different settings than the defaults). </p><p></p><p>For general editing I have discovered a workflow in Affinity that works great 99% of the time for me. I have found to work out "noise" in the develop module first, this is key to preserving details in the file for me. If I use a "de-noise" tool after developing that is when the details go south fast. I now go a few months and hundreds of photos without using Topaz (when I do I'm trying to save a poorly taken photo). A cool thing about Affinity is you can go back to the develop module from the normal editor to "tune" things in seamlessly effectively re-developing a file. </p><p></p><p>The point of opening this area of discussion is you may find you have the tools you need already (I think you are a Light room user) many find the Adobe AI de noise very satisfactory. Or a unique workflow that makes life easier and gives the results you like. </p><p></p><p>Learning new software is challenging for sure, I'm still trying to "learn" Print Shop Pro that I got free with the D850. Initially I thought is was horrible, but have found its just supper different to get a result I'm used too. I find Affinity much easier and faster for me with far less steps.</p><p></p><p>Ive never tried DXO but most reviews rave about it using a workflow I think is likely similar to yours.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nikonbill, post: 845995, member: 47024"] I see you have had no responses for a while. I can add some input on my own de-noising adventures. I also have Topaz photo AI and a working copy (for now) of topaz Photo (the new one) I let that subscription run out last spring I'm at V1.3.3but it still functions. Topaz AI and photo work similar for most noisy photos I use it on regarding de-noise. What I do not like is the smoothing of pixels Topaz does to de noise, on many photos this looks worse to me than a "little" left over nose (I try different settings than the defaults). For general editing I have discovered a workflow in Affinity that works great 99% of the time for me. I have found to work out "noise" in the develop module first, this is key to preserving details in the file for me. If I use a "de-noise" tool after developing that is when the details go south fast. I now go a few months and hundreds of photos without using Topaz (when I do I'm trying to save a poorly taken photo). A cool thing about Affinity is you can go back to the develop module from the normal editor to "tune" things in seamlessly effectively re-developing a file. The point of opening this area of discussion is you may find you have the tools you need already (I think you are a Light room user) many find the Adobe AI de noise very satisfactory. Or a unique workflow that makes life easier and gives the results you like. Learning new software is challenging for sure, I'm still trying to "learn" Print Shop Pro that I got free with the D850. Initially I thought is was horrible, but have found its just supper different to get a result I'm used too. I find Affinity much easier and faster for me with far less steps. Ive never tried DXO but most reviews rave about it using a workflow I think is likely similar to yours. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Post Processing
Denoise software options
Top