Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Dear Santa (Nikon),
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DraganDL" data-source="post: 230804" data-attributes="member: 18251"><p>Well, it was just an example (colleague etc.). The point is, it seems that Nikon and Canon are very reluctant to make a MAJOR step up in hardware - radical change of the sensor(s). If you compare the level of noise on dpreview's "studio comparison tool", for example, between Fuji XE1 and ANY recent DX camera, at, say, 25600 ISO, you'll see (yes, see!) what I mean. Why, even D800 shows more noise than XE1 (full frame vs APSC!!!). I hope, this will give you a good insight into the issue. If not, sorry - I am not an ophthalmologist...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DraganDL, post: 230804, member: 18251"] Well, it was just an example (colleague etc.). The point is, it seems that Nikon and Canon are very reluctant to make a MAJOR step up in hardware - radical change of the sensor(s). If you compare the level of noise on dpreview's "studio comparison tool", for example, between Fuji XE1 and ANY recent DX camera, at, say, 25600 ISO, you'll see (yes, see!) what I mean. Why, even D800 shows more noise than XE1 (full frame vs APSC!!!). I hope, this will give you a good insight into the issue. If not, sorry - I am not an ophthalmologist... [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Off Topic
Dear Santa (Nikon),
Top
