Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="rocketman122" data-source="post: 583841" data-attributes="member: 14443">first time you say? very nice. you looking for feedback of &quot;nice or not&quot;&nbsp; or constructive criticism? if I say one major issue, its stability hand&nbsp; holding. very shaky. editing is fine. filler parts in the beginning are not here nor there. not stable ,too short, composition shows little. the left pan of the distant building adds little. it cvould be much better.&nbsp; try shooting some frame in frame footage. the shots are all clean and &quot;proper&quot; but needs some creative angles. hard to see more since its a small window. any link to a full screen? what lenses were used?&nbsp; consider using some led lighting for the nigh shots. backlit perhaps. has a lot of potential but needs some work to get the pro polished look. but thats just time. get a stabilizer like the monocam<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=il_AIOYTNro" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=il_AIOYTNro</a>or even a gimbal like the beholder</blockquote>

[QUOTE="rocketman122, post: 583841, member: 14443"] first time you say? very nice. you looking for feedback of "nice or not" or constructive criticism? if I say one major issue, its stability hand holding. very shaky. editing is fine. filler parts in the beginning are not here nor there. not stable ,too short, composition shows little. the left pan of the distant building adds little. it cvould be much better. try shooting some frame in frame footage. the shots are all clean and "proper" but needs some creative angles. hard to see more since its a small window. any link to a full screen? what lenses were used? consider using some led lighting for the nigh shots. backlit perhaps. has a lot of potential but needs some work to get the pro polished look. but thats just time. get a stabilizer like the monocam [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=il_AIOYTNro[/URL] or even a gimbal like the beholder [/QUOTE]

Verification