Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Dana : A Fine Line Between Beauty & Glamour. Blamour?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eye-level" data-source="post: 112090" data-attributes="member: 6548"><p>What about the principle of <em>less</em> light? All other things equal the less light on a subject the less contrast there will be. Consider the case of a white cube on a piece of black velvet. Though the black velvet cannot be made lighter, the cube <em>can</em> be made darker, by <em>reducing </em>the amount of light.</p><p></p><p>And what about this dogma of the perfect exposure being the minimum exposure just short of underexposure? Is it a film deal? Why doesn't digital deal with highlights very well?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eye-level, post: 112090, member: 6548"] What about the principle of [I]less[/I] light? All other things equal the less light on a subject the less contrast there will be. Consider the case of a white cube on a piece of black velvet. Though the black velvet cannot be made lighter, the cube [I]can[/I] be made darker, by [I]reducing [/I]the amount of light. And what about this dogma of the perfect exposure being the minimum exposure just short of underexposure? Is it a film deal? Why doesn't digital deal with highlights very well? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Learning
Photography Q&A
Dana : A Fine Line Between Beauty & Glamour. Blamour?
Top
