Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
D9300 to be the D300s replacement? (D400)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Geoffc" data-source="post: 287517" data-attributes="member: 8705"><p>Don't confuse FX as always better than DX. The DX bodies are much closer in image quality these days including high ISO. I'm not saying there is not a gap but it's much smaller than when the D300 and D700 where the DX and FX advanced amateur bodies.</p><p></p><p>Both formats have their place. Yesterday I left home with the D7100 in preference to my D800 because I wanted to pot a few birds. The resolution for that application is better because I can only fill a DX frame size anyway.the same often applies for macro shots. It also has higher frames per second, albeit the buffer is smaller.</p><p></p><p>The D9300 or whatever it's called will probably do 8-10 fps with a good buffer for raw. It will be a better build quality, albeit the D7100 is pretty good. The AF will probably be the same as the D7100 was a step up from the D7000 at 51 points. As for other features between the body types they don't cause me an issue.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Geoffc, post: 287517, member: 8705"] Don't confuse FX as always better than DX. The DX bodies are much closer in image quality these days including high ISO. I'm not saying there is not a gap but it's much smaller than when the D300 and D700 where the DX and FX advanced amateur bodies. Both formats have their place. Yesterday I left home with the D7100 in preference to my D800 because I wanted to pot a few birds. The resolution for that application is better because I can only fill a DX frame size anyway.the same often applies for macro shots. It also has higher frames per second, albeit the buffer is smaller. The D9300 or whatever it's called will probably do 8-10 fps with a good buffer for raw. It will be a better build quality, albeit the D7100 is pretty good. The AF will probably be the same as the D7100 was a step up from the D7000 at 51 points. As for other features between the body types they don't cause me an issue. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
General Digital SLR Cameras
D9300 to be the D300s replacement? (D400)
Top