Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
Out of Production DSLRs
D90
D90 Maximum print size
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrF" data-source="post: 235585" data-attributes="member: 10292"><p>To give some perspective, Mike, 300 ppi is usually described as a "magazine quality photo" and looks sharp even when you look at it up close. When I was first getting into printing and framing photos, I had a 16x20 printed that came out to about 160 ppi. ShootRaw's chart describes that as poor quality, and I would agree to a point. If I held the photo about 8" away from my face, I can see individual pixels. But no one looks at a 16x20 hanging on the wall that way. You tend to step back a few feet to take in the whole photo, and from that distance it looks great. Now if you print a 3x5 at 160 ppi, people will notice just because you tend to look at something that size a lot closer. Just some things to think about.</p><p></p><p>Oh, and if you want to go bigger, consider canvas. I had a coupon for one of the places that prints on canvas (I can't remember which one) and decided to try something out and printed a 1MP image at 20x30. I don't remember the exact count, but I believe it came out to around 40ppi. The texture of the canvas tends to hide the low quality of the image. If I did it again, I don't think I would go quite as extreme, but it's something to consider.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrF, post: 235585, member: 10292"] To give some perspective, Mike, 300 ppi is usually described as a "magazine quality photo" and looks sharp even when you look at it up close. When I was first getting into printing and framing photos, I had a 16x20 printed that came out to about 160 ppi. ShootRaw's chart describes that as poor quality, and I would agree to a point. If I held the photo about 8" away from my face, I can see individual pixels. But no one looks at a 16x20 hanging on the wall that way. You tend to step back a few feet to take in the whole photo, and from that distance it looks great. Now if you print a 3x5 at 160 ppi, people will notice just because you tend to look at something that size a lot closer. Just some things to think about. Oh, and if you want to go bigger, consider canvas. I had a coupon for one of the places that prints on canvas (I can't remember which one) and decided to try something out and printed a 1MP image at 20x30. I don't remember the exact count, but I believe it came out to around 40ppi. The texture of the canvas tends to hide the low quality of the image. If I did it again, I don't think I would go quite as extreme, but it's something to consider. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Nikon DSLR Cameras
Out of Production DSLRs
D90
D90 Maximum print size
Top