Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="J-see" data-source="post: 436530" data-attributes="member: 31330">Some more differences:Today I was testing whether or not to use ISO and what made me frown was that a by one stop underexposed shot taken at ISO 800 showed noise in the lighter areas of the shot. It appears that if I shoot without ISO and normalise the exposure in post, I get cleaner results than when using ISO and let the cam do the amplification. At least at lower ISO. For the D750 both approaches lead to close to similar results. That there is more noise in the D810 doesn't surprise me but that the middle tones suffer does.It's easily fixed in post but that it shows that soon is a bit disappointing. The full well capacity of the D810 pixels isn't that much smaller but apparently it does not do a that good job during the read-out or manipulation as the D750 does.For focus tracking the D810 seems to result in more hits than the D750 when shooting bursts and I suspect the wider spaced focal points have something to do with it. When light gets low that'll probably work against me and then the D750 will do better.There are more differences than I expected but about all are small.No processing:[ATTACH]148833[/ATTACH][ATTACH]148834[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="J-see, post: 436530, member: 31330"] Some more differences: Today I was testing whether or not to use ISO and what made me frown was that a by one stop underexposed shot taken at ISO 800 showed noise in the lighter areas of the shot. It appears that if I shoot without ISO and normalise the exposure in post, I get cleaner results than when using ISO and let the cam do the amplification. At least at lower ISO. For the D750 both approaches lead to close to similar results. That there is more noise in the D810 doesn't surprise me but that the middle tones suffer does. It's easily fixed in post but that it shows that soon is a bit disappointing. The full well capacity of the D810 pixels isn't that much smaller but apparently it does not do a that good job during the read-out or manipulation as the D750 does. For focus tracking the D810 seems to result in more hits than the D750 when shooting bursts and I suspect the wider spaced focal points have something to do with it. When light gets low that'll probably work against me and then the D750 will do better. There are more differences than I expected but about all are small. No processing: [ATTACH=CONFIG]148833._xfImport[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]148834._xfImport[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification