Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Geoffc" data-source="post: 199490" data-attributes="member: 8705">Silven,Shrinking the D800 to DX does not end up with the D7100 it's nearer the D7000. Also, this debate keeps drifting onto IQ when it was supposed to be about resolution. Whilst I appreciate that the IQ of a 4mm point and shoot sensor might impact resolving power, it just doesn't have that impact with an APSC like the 7100. To keep the whole thing on track, go back to your original bear and measure how many megapixels your cropped image was. If the answer is less than 16 mp I think my original point stands. From those images I can't imagine it would be bigger.At least this whole thing has got everybody thinking which is always a good thing <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Geoffc, post: 199490, member: 8705"] Silven, Shrinking the D800 to DX does not end up with the D7100 it's nearer the D7000. Also, this debate keeps drifting onto IQ when it was supposed to be about resolution. Whilst I appreciate that the IQ of a 4mm point and shoot sensor might impact resolving power, it just doesn't have that impact with an APSC like the 7100. To keep the whole thing on track, go back to your original bear and measure how many megapixels your cropped image was. If the answer is less than 16 mp I think my original point stands. From those images I can't imagine it would be bigger. At least this whole thing has got everybody thinking which is always a good thing :-) [/QUOTE]

Verification